Analyst Olban Valladares, considered that entrepreneur Schucry Kafie should be favored with a presumption of innocence, as the laws that have been emitted should favor everybody with no distinctions whatsoever.

Case in point, he exemplified, that some judges have been lenient with defense attorneys and have easily granted precautionary measures in known cases of bigger felonies, but entrepreneur Kafie was not given these.

“The fact that a chicken is stolen or a million is stolen should not be relevant in the application of justice. If the law allows that entrepreneur Kafie or anybody else for that matter, follow due process without incarceration, it is because the case states that a presumption of innocence should be made and incarceration should then be given once the sentence has been issued. He should be able to enjoy that as any other citizen would.”

“It is the perception that the government or the system needs to assuage the clamor in the streets with political, entrepreneurial, and managerial figures. All people should be given their rights.”

“It befuddles me that in the cases of entrepreneurs linked to Social Security, defense lawyers’ petitions are granted for people who have committed graver felonies and precautionary measures have been granted easily. The purpose of reforming the law is that the accused be presumed innocent until proven guilty, not like before when you were presumed guilty, placed in jail, until proven innocent.”